Element vs Stackfield
Both Element and Stackfield are European-built, GDPR-compliant solutions in the messaging & chat space. This comparison breaks down their features, pricing, compliance posture, and data residency so you can make an informed choice for your team.
Quick Overview
Element
EU- Headquarters
- London, GB
- Pricing
- Free
- Open Source
- Yes
Stackfield
EU- Headquarters
- Munich, DE
- Pricing
- From €11/mo
- Open Source
- No
Key Differences
- Element offers a free tier, while stackfield starts at €11/month. This makes Element more accessible for individuals and small teams exploring their options before committing.
- Element is open source, meaning you can audit the code, self-host, and avoid vendor lock-in. Stackfield is proprietary, which often means a more polished out-of-the-box experience and dedicated support, but less flexibility for customisation.
- Data residency differs: Element hosts data in GB, Germany, while Stackfield hosts in Germany. If your organisation requires data to stay in a specific EU country, this distinction matters for compliance.
- Stackfield holds ISO 27001 certification, providing third-party assurance of its security practices. Element does not currently hold these certifications, which may matter for enterprise procurement requirements.
- Stackfield was founded in 2012, giving it a 5-year head start over Element (founded 2017). More time in market often means a larger user community and more mature integrations, though newer entrants may offer more modern architectures.
- Each product has unique strengths: Element offers Matrix protocol and Federation, while Stackfield provides Task management and Video calls. Your choice depends on which capabilities matter most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Element | Stackfield |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Element | Stackfield |
| Pricing | Free | From €11/mo |
| Free Tier | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Headquarters | London, GB | Munich, DE |
| Data Centers | GB, DE | DE |
| End-to-end encryption | ||
| Matrix protocol | ||
| Federation | ||
| Bridges to other platforms | ||
| Voice/video calls | ||
| Threads | ||
| Spaces | ||
| Self-hosting option | ||
| Widgets | ||
| Task management | ||
| Video calls | ||
| Document collaboration | ||
| Chat channels | ||
| Audit logs | ||
| Custom workflows | ||
| GDPR by design |
Pricing Comparison
Element
Freefreemium
Stackfield
From €11/mosubscription
Compliance Comparison
Element
GDPRDPA
Stackfield
GDPRISO 27001DPA
Get Started
Categories
How to Choose
You need code transparency or self-hosting
Choose Element
You want a fully managed, turnkey solution
Choose Stackfield
You're a startup or individual on a budget
Choose Element
Your procurement requires ISO 27001 certification
Choose Stackfield
You need enterprise-grade support and stability
Choose Element
You prefer a nimble provider with personalised support
Choose Stackfield
Element vs Stackfield — FAQ
What is the main difference between Element and Stackfield?
Both Element and Stackfield are European messaging & chat and team collaboration solutions with full GDPR compliance. The key differences lie in their approach: Element is open source while Stackfield is proprietary, and Element uses freemium pricing while Stackfield uses subscription. Element is headquartered in London, GB, while Stackfield is based in Munich, Germany. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements for features, pricing, and data residency.
Which is more affordable, Element or Stackfield?
Element offers a free tier, while stackfield starts at €11/month. Pricing models differ (freemium vs. subscription), so compare based on your usage pattern rather than just the starting price.
Are both Element and Stackfield GDPR compliant?
Yes. Both Element and Stackfield are European companies that store data within the EU/EEA and offer Data Processing Agreements. Neither is subject to the US CLOUD Act or FISA surveillance. Additionally, Stackfield holds ISO 27001 certification. For GDPR purposes, either option eliminates the legal risks associated with using US-based services.