Baserow vs Stackfield
Both Baserow and Stackfield are European-built, GDPR-compliant solutions in the team collaboration space. This comparison breaks down their features, pricing, compliance posture, and data residency so you can make an informed choice for your team.
Quick Overview
Baserow
EU- Headquarters
- Amsterdam, NL
- Pricing
- Free
- Open Source
- Yes
Stackfield
EU- Headquarters
- Munich, DE
- Pricing
- From €11/mo
- Open Source
- No
Key Differences
- Baserow offers a free tier, while stackfield starts at €11/month. This makes Baserow more accessible for individuals and small teams exploring their options before committing.
- Baserow is open source, meaning you can audit the code, self-host, and avoid vendor lock-in. Stackfield is proprietary, which often means a more polished out-of-the-box experience and dedicated support, but less flexibility for customisation.
- Data residency differs: Baserow hosts data in EU, while Stackfield hosts in Germany. If your organisation requires data to stay in a specific EU country, this distinction matters for compliance.
- Stackfield holds ISO 27001 certification, providing third-party assurance of its security practices. Baserow does not currently hold these certifications, which may matter for enterprise procurement requirements.
- Stackfield was founded in 2012, giving it a 8-year head start over Baserow (founded 2020). More time in market often means a larger user community and more mature integrations, though newer entrants may offer more modern architectures.
- Each product has unique strengths: Baserow offers Spreadsheet-like interface and Relational database, while Stackfield provides End-to-end encryption and Task management. Your choice depends on which capabilities matter most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Baserow | Stackfield |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baserow | Stackfield |
| Pricing | Free | From €11/mo |
| Free Tier | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, NL | Munich, DE |
| Data Centers | EU | DE |
| Spreadsheet-like interface | ||
| Relational database | ||
| Multiple views (grid, Kanban, gallery, form, calendar) | ||
| Formula fields | ||
| REST API | ||
| Real-time collaboration | ||
| Application builder | ||
| Webhooks and integrations | ||
| Role-based access control | ||
| Self-hosting option | ||
| End-to-end encryption | ||
| Task management | ||
| Video calls | ||
| Document collaboration | ||
| Chat channels | ||
| Audit logs | ||
| Custom workflows | ||
| GDPR by design |
Pricing Comparison
Baserow
Freefreemium
Stackfield
From €11/mosubscription
Compliance Comparison
Baserow
GDPRDPA
Stackfield
GDPRISO 27001DPA
Get Started
Categories
How to Choose
You need code transparency or self-hosting
Choose Baserow
You want a fully managed, turnkey solution
Choose Stackfield
You're a startup or individual on a budget
Choose Baserow
Your procurement requires ISO 27001 certification
Choose Stackfield
Baserow vs Stackfield — FAQ
What is the main difference between Baserow and Stackfield?
Both Baserow and Stackfield are European team collaboration solutions with full GDPR compliance. The key differences lie in their approach: Baserow is open source while Stackfield is proprietary, and Baserow uses freemium pricing while Stackfield uses subscription. Baserow is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, while Stackfield is based in Munich, Germany. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements for features, pricing, and data residency.
Which is more affordable, Baserow or Stackfield?
Baserow offers a free tier, while stackfield starts at €11/month. Pricing models differ (freemium vs. subscription), so compare based on your usage pattern rather than just the starting price.
Are both Baserow and Stackfield GDPR compliant?
Yes. Both Baserow and Stackfield are European companies that store data within the EU/EEA and offer Data Processing Agreements. Neither is subject to the US CLOUD Act or FISA surveillance. Additionally, Stackfield holds ISO 27001 certification. For GDPR purposes, either option eliminates the legal risks associated with using US-based services.